| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs Ryzen 5 4600H


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.9 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
860f01
Core
Ice Lake-U
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
334.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
15.48k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
22.82k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
8.63k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
7.17k (x1.12)
TOTAL
50.62k
54.11k (x1.07)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
117.98k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
146.43k (x3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
65.54k (x3.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
4.77k (x1.13)
TOTAL
116.63k
334.72k (x2.87)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
7438 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4