| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs Ryzen 3 3350U


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
810f81
Core
Ice Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
144.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
13.25k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
21.67k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
4.79k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
3.98k (x0.62)
TOTAL
50.62k
43.7k (x0.86)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
46.47k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
78.38k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
16.69k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
3.3k (x0.78)
TOTAL
116.63k
144.84k (x1.24)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
9656 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4