| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs FX 8120


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 8120 is based on Bulldozer.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 98.9 k points while the 8120 gets 70.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 1.4 times faster than the 8120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
600f12
Core
Ice Lake-U
Zambezi
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x64+8x16 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
23.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
70.78k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
9.31k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
6.85k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.43k
2.77k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
4.58k (x1)
TOTAL
39.93k
23.5k (x0.59)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

8120
Test#1 (Integers)
29.07k
25.84k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
46.14k
28.49k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.47k
13.84k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
2.61k (x0.62)
TOTAL
98.86k
70.78k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
1938 points/W
207 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3076 points/W
228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
279 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
6591 points/W
566 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
3510 points/GHz
2327 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4996 points/GHz
1712 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1890 points/GHz
693 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4