| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs A12 9800


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 1.2 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
660f51
Core
Ice Lake-U
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
August 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
100.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
13.42k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
17.61k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
3.77k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
3.06k (x0.48)
TOTAL
50.62k
37.86k (x0.75)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

9800
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
40.46k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
43.18k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
12.78k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
4.37k (x1.03)
TOTAL
116.63k
100.79k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
1551 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4