Core M-5Y10c vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.4 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.4 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
306e4
Core
Broadwell-Y
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
12 /24
TDP
5 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2014
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
633.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
10.53k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
9.98k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
4k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.4k (x1.14)
TOTAL
22.93k
27.92k (x1.22)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
247.05k (x16.39)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
264.43k (x10.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
111.01k (x16.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
10.66k (x2.39)
TOTAL
51k
633.14k (x12.41)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4