| | | | | | |

Core M-5Y10c vs Xeon E5-2660 v2


Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 9 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
306e4
Core
Broadwell-Y
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
10 /20
TDP
5 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25600 kB
Date
October 2014
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
459.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
7.26k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
6.9k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.77k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
2.55k (x0.86)
TOTAL
22.93k
19.48k (x0.85)

Multithread

M-5Y10c

E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
180.2k (x11.96)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
191.43k (x7.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
80.22k (x12.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
7.46k (x1.68)
TOTAL
51k
459.31k (x9.01)

Performance/W
M-5Y10c
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
4835 points/W

Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4