Core M-5Y10c vs m7-6Y75
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.1 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.1 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
406e3
Core
Broadwell-Y
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
5 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2014
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
10.24k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
15.33k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.97k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
5.32k (x1.78)
TOTAL
22.93k
33.86k (x1.48)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
16.78k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
25.09k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
6.14k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
5.58k (x1.25)
TOTAL
51k
53.58k (x1.05)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4