Core M-5Y10c vs i5-7200U
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i5-7200U gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.6 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i5-7200U gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.6 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
806e9
Core
Broadwell-Y
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2014
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
97.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
11.36k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
17.26k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
4.03k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
4.77k (x1.6)
TOTAL
22.93k
37.42k (x1.63)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
24.08k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
41.23k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
10.19k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
4.72k (x1.06)
TOTAL
51k
80.22k (x1.57)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
1605 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
2749 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
679 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
315 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
5348 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3666 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1537 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
12072 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4