Core M-5Y10c vs i5-5200U
Description
Both models M-5Y10c and i5-5200U are based on Broadwell architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
306d4
Core
Broadwell-Y
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /4
TDP
5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2014
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
68.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
8.48k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
12.03k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.32k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
2.79k (x0.94)
TOTAL
22.93k
26.62k (x1.16)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
15.19k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
25.99k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
6.71k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
2.96k (x0.66)
TOTAL
51k
50.85k (x1)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
1013 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
1733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
3390 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
9860 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4