Core M-5Y10c vs i5-3320M
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
306a9
Core
Broadwell-Y
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
5 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2014
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
58.81k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
10.64k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
10.53k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
4.07k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.97k (x1.33)
TOTAL
22.93k
29.22k (x1.27)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
21.27k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
23.93k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
9.48k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
4.12k (x0.92)
TOTAL
51k
58.81k (x1.15)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
608 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
684 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
1680 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
3191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
8853 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4