Core M-5Y10c vs i5-3210M
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i5-3210M gets 51.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 1 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i5-3210M gets 51.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 1 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
306a9
Core
Broadwell-Y
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
5 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2014
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
51.73k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
9.11k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
8.88k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.46k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.45k (x1.16)
TOTAL
22.93k
24.9k (x1.09)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
18.72k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
21.09k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
8.38k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
3.54k (x0.79)
TOTAL
51k
51.73k (x1.01)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
603 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
239 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
1478 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
2939 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
2863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1117 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1112 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
8032 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4