Core M-5Y10c vs i5-2500K
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 2.2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 2.2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
206a7
Core
Broadwell-Y
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
5 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2014
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
32.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
111.83k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
11.84k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
10.43k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
5.22k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
5.36k (x1.8)
TOTAL
22.93k
32.85k (x1.43)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
45.51k (x3.02)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
40.83k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
20.7k (x3.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
4.79k (x1.08)
TOTAL
51k
111.83k (x2.19)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
218 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
1177 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
8878 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4