Core M-5Y10c vs i3-9100
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i3-9100 gets 164.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 3.2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i3-9100 gets 164.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 3.2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
906eb
Core
Broadwell-Y
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
5 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2014
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
229.2k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
14.81k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
22.15k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
5.42k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
4.8k (x1.61)
TOTAL
22.93k
47.17k (x2.06)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
52.08k (x3.46)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
87.45k (x3.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
20.98k (x3.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
4.24k (x0.95)
TOTAL
51k
164.75k (x3.23)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
801 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
323 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
65 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
2535 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
5274 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1289 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1143 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
11232 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4