Core M-5Y10c vs FX 8320
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the 8320 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
600f20
Core
Broadwell-Y
Vishera
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
5 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2014
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
16.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
103.21k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
5.35k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
5.14k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.15k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
4.04k (x1.35)
TOTAL
22.93k
16.68k (x0.73)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
36.79k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
40.2k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
19.57k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
6.66k (x1.49)
TOTAL
51k
103.21k (x2.02)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
826 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
1285 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
537 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1010 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
4171 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4