| | | | | | |

Core M-5Y10c vs FX 4100


Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the 4100 is based on Bulldozer.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.

Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.2 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
600f12
Core
Broadwell-Y
Zambezi
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
5 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2014
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
22.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
44.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
7.65k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
6.9k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.88k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
4.75k (x1.59)
TOTAL
22.93k
22.18k (x0.97)

Multithread

M-5Y10c

4100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
15.53k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
15.13k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
7.98k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
5.67k (x1.27)
TOTAL
51k
44.31k (x0.87)

Performance/W
M-5Y10c
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
163 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
159 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
60 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
466 points/W

Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
1815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
758 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
5836 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4