Core M-5Y10c vs A9 9420
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.9 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.9 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
670f00
Core
Broadwell-Y
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
5 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2014
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
46.33k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
7.55k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
13.9k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.11k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
2.18k (x0.73)
TOTAL
22.93k
26.74k (x1.17)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
9.09k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
12.25k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
3k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
1.81k (x0.41)
TOTAL
51k
26.15k (x0.51)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
817 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
1743 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
2096 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
3862 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
864 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
604 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
7427 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4