Core M-5Y10c vs A6 7400K
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the 7400K is based on Steamroller.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 7400K gets 34.3 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.5 times faster than the 7400K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 7400K gets 34.3 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.5 times faster than the 7400K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
630f01
Core
Broadwell-Y
Kaveri
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2+
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
5 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2014
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
34.28k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
8.78k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
9.45k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.39k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
2.39k (x0.8)
TOTAL
22.93k
24.01k (x1.05)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
13.5k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
12.17k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
5.96k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
2.65k (x0.59)
TOTAL
51k
34.28k (x0.67)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
208 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
187 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
92 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
527 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
2252 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
869 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
612 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
6156 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4