Core M-5Y10c vs A10 5745M
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the 5745M is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 5745M gets 37.1 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.4 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 5745M gets 37.1 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.4 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
610f31
Core
Broadwell-Y
Richland
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FP2
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
5 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2014
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
17.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
37.11k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
6.66k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
5.63k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.4k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
2.39k (x0.8)
TOTAL
22.93k
17.08k (x0.74)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
13.55k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
13.9k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
6.75k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
2.91k (x0.65)
TOTAL
51k
37.11k (x0.73)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
556 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
1484 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
2297 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
1941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
828 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4