Core Duo T2450 vs Celeron N2840
Description
The T2450 is based on Mobile architecture while the N2840 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2450 gets a score of 11.4 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.5 times faster than the T2450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2450 gets a score of 11.4 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.5 times faster than the T2450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6ec
30678
Core
Yonah
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
micro FC-PGA 478-pin
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
6.49k points
10.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.37k points
16.79k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T2450
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1.81k
4.8k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
1.96k
2.47k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.81k
1.86k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.22k (x1.35)
TOTAL
6.49k
10.36k (x1.6)
Multithread
T2450
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
8.24k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
3.89k
4.19k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.1k
3.05k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.97k
1.32k (x1.35)
TOTAL
11.37k
16.79k (x1.48)
Performance/W
T2450
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)