Celeron N5105 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.7 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.7 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
f4a
Core
Jasper Lake
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.55 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
10 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
- kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
- kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
- kB
Date
March 2021
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
3.87k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
8.17k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
2.67k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
1.82k (x0.47)
TOTAL
27.1k
16.53k (x0.61)
Multithread
N5105
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
3.46k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
22.59k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
8.09k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
2.85k (x0.56)
TOTAL
64.09k
37k (x0.58)
Performance/W
N5105
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4