Celeron N5105 vs Xeon X5675
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.9 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.9 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
206c2
Core
Jasper Lake
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /12
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
8.77k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
5.82k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
3.47k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
2.98k (x0.77)
TOTAL
27.1k
21.04k (x0.78)
Multithread
N5105
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
53.23k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
39.35k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
27.05k (x2.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
5.28k (x1.04)
TOTAL
64.09k
124.92k (x1.95)
Performance/W
N5105
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4