| | | | | | |

Celeron N5105 vs Xeon W3550


Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the W3550 is based on .

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W3550 is 1.1 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
106a5
Core
Jasper Lake
Bloomfield
Architecture
Tremont
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
10 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
73.21k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
8.34k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
5.56k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
3.26k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.08k (x0.79)
TOTAL
27.1k
20.24k (x0.75)

Multithread

N5105

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
32.5k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
21.59k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
12.85k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
6.27k (x1.24)
TOTAL
64.09k
73.21k (x1.14)

Performance/W
N5105
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
250 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
563 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5105
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
2502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
6073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4