Celeron N5105 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 9.6 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 9.6 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
306e4
Core
Jasper Lake
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
12 /24
TDP
10 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
633.14k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
10.64k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
9.53k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
4.12k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.62k (x0.93)
TOTAL
27.1k
27.91k (x1.03)
Multithread
N5105
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
252.69k (x10.09)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
238.68k (x9.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
115.5k (x12.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
10.98k (x2.17)
TOTAL
64.09k
617.84k (x9.64)
Performance/W
N5105
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
1944 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
1836 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
888 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
4753 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
3041 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
2722 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
7973 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4