Celeron N5105 vs Pentium 4417U
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.6 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.6 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
806ea
Core
Jasper Lake
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
41.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
7.94k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
11.35k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
2.39k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
2.8k (x0.72)
TOTAL
27.1k
24.49k (x0.9)
Multithread
N5105
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
13.1k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
21.1k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
4.49k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
2.46k (x0.49)
TOTAL
64.09k
41.15k (x0.64)
Performance/W
N5105
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
2743 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4