Celeron N5105 vs Core 2 Duo E8400
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the E8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 2.4 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 2.4 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
1067a
Core
Jasper Lake
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
17.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
27.11k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
3.3k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
7.28k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
2.88k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.83k (x0.99)
TOTAL
27.1k
17.28k (x0.64)
Multithread
N5105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
6.3k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
13.71k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
5.32k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
1.78k (x0.35)
TOTAL
64.09k
27.11k (x0.42)
Performance/W
N5105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
97 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
82 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
417 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
2426 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4