Celeron N5105 vs Core i7-920
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
106a5
Core
Jasper Lake
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.993 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
10 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
November 2008
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
16.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
47.2k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
6.12k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
4.76k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
2.78k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
2.67k (x0.69)
TOTAL
27.1k
16.33k (x0.6)
Multithread
N5105
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
19.26k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
14.96k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
8.05k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
4.92k (x0.97)
TOTAL
64.09k
47.2k (x0.74)
Performance/W
N5105
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
115 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
363 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
2044 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
1591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
930 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
5457 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4