| | | | | | |

Celeron N5105 vs Core i5-7200U


Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i5-7200U gets 75.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.2 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
806e9
Core
Jasper Lake
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
97.52k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
11.39k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
16.47k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
4.36k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
5.21k (x1.34)
TOTAL
27.1k
37.43k (x1.38)

Multithread

N5105

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
23.57k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
37.4k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
10.15k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
4.78k (x0.94)
TOTAL
64.09k
75.9k (x1.18)

Performance/W
N5105
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
1572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
5060 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5105
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
3674 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
5313 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
12073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4