Celeron N5105 vs Core i5-3210M
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i5-3210M gets 53.7 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i5-3210M gets 53.7 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
306a9
Core
Jasper Lake
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2021
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
51.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
8.59k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
8.88k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
3.59k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.45k (x0.89)
TOTAL
27.1k
24.51k (x0.9)
Multithread
N5105
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
20.18k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
19.96k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
8.93k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
4.6k (x0.91)
TOTAL
64.09k
53.67k (x0.84)
Performance/W
N5105
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
577 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
255 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
1533 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
2864 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
1114 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
7908 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4