| | | | | | |

Celeron N5105 vs Core i3-8100


Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i3-8100 gets 152.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 2.4 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
906eb
Core
Jasper Lake
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
200.4k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
13.51k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
19.38k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
5.06k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
7.87k (x2.03)
TOTAL
27.1k
45.81k (x1.69)

Multithread

N5105

i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
52.88k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
75.92k (x3.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
19.52k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
4.53k (x0.9)
TOTAL
64.09k
152.86k (x2.39)

Performance/W
N5105
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
814 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
300 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
2352 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5105
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
3753 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
5383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1405 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
12725 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4