Celeron N5095 vs Xeon W3520
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.3 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.3 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
106a5
Core
Jasper Lake
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2021
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
7.35k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
4.89k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
2.9k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
2.82k (x1.19)
TOTAL
26.6k
17.96k (x0.68)
Multithread
N5095
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
29.69k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
22.26k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
14.91k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
6.29k (x2.32)
TOTAL
93.26k
73.16k (x0.78)
Performance/W
N5095
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4