Celeron N5095 vs Xeon E5502
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 4.2 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 4.2 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
106a5
Core
Jasper Lake
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.867 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
64 kB
Cache L2
kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2021
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
22.28k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
4.76k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
3.15k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
1.94k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
1.45k (x0.62)
TOTAL
26.6k
11.3k (x0.42)
Multithread
N5095
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
9.48k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
6.3k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
3.86k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.64k (x0.97)
TOTAL
93.26k
22.28k (x0.24)
Performance/W
N5095
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
278 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4