| | | | | | |

Celeron N5095 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 6.6 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
306e4
Core
Jasper Lake
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
12 /24
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2021
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
633.14k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
10.64k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
9.53k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
4.12k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
3.62k (x1.53)
TOTAL
26.6k
27.91k (x1.05)

Multithread

N5095

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
252.69k (x6.86)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
238.68k (x6.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
115.5k (x7.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
10.98k (x4.04)
TOTAL
93.26k
617.84k (x6.63)

Performance/W
N5095
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
1944 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
1836 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
888 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
4753 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5095
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
3041 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
2722 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
7973 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4