Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-860
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i7-860 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i7-860 gets 75.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i7-860 gets 75.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
106e5
Core
Jasper Lake
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2021
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
19.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
75.43k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
7.87k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
5.25k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
2.94k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
3.13k (x1.32)
TOTAL
26.6k
19.19k (x0.72)
Multithread
N5095
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
31.5k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
23.47k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
15.47k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
4.98k (x1.83)
TOTAL
93.26k
75.43k (x0.81)
Performance/W
N5095
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
332 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
247 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
163 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
52 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
794 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
2271 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
1514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
902 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
5534 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4