Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-7560U
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i7-7560U gets 88.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i7-7560U gets 88.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
806e9
Core
Jasper Lake
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
97.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
12.78k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
18.79k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
4.72k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
8.95k (x3.79)
TOTAL
26.6k
45.24k (x1.7)
Multithread
N5095
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
23.04k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
40.07k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
10.08k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
15.24k (x5.61)
TOTAL
93.26k
88.42k (x0.95)
Performance/W
N5095
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
1536 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
2671 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
672 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
1016 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
5894 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
3364 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
4946 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1241 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
2355 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
11905 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4