| | | | | | |

Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-6600U


Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i7-6600U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i7-6600U gets 48.2 k points.

Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
406e3
Core
Jasper Lake
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2021
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
39.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
79.22k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
6.76k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
9.58k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
2.46k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
4.18k (x1.77)
TOTAL
26.6k
22.99k (x0.86)

Multithread

N5095

i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
14.37k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
23.79k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
5.71k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
4.29k (x1.58)
TOTAL
93.26k
48.16k (x0.52)

Performance/W
N5095
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
958 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
1586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
286 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
3211 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5095
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
724 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
1229 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
6761 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4