| | | | | | |

Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-520M


Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-520M is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.

Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
20652
Core
Jasper Lake
Arrandale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
FC-PGA 988
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
15.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
33.14k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
6.67k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
4.59k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
2.49k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
2.18k (x0.92)
TOTAL
26.6k
15.93k (x0.6)

Multithread

N5095

i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
13.75k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
10.03k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
6.67k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.68k (x0.99)
TOTAL
93.26k
33.14k (x0.36)

Performance/W
N5095
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
393 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
287 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
947 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5095
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
1567 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
742 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
5433 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4