Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-6400
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-6400 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i5-6400 gets 129.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 1.4 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i5-6400 gets 129.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 1.4 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
506e3
Core
Jasper Lake
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2021
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
48.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
174.05k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
11.56k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
16.53k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
4.3k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
3.97k (x1.68)
TOTAL
26.6k
36.36k (x1.37)
Multithread
N5095
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
43.01k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
64.46k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
16.14k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
5.91k (x2.17)
TOTAL
93.26k
129.51k (x1.39)
Performance/W
N5095
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
662 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
992 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
1992 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
5009 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
11018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4