Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-3320M
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i5-3320M gets 54.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i5-3320M gets 54.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
306a9
Core
Jasper Lake
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2021
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
58.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
10.89k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
9.77k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
3.98k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
3.77k (x1.6)
TOTAL
26.6k
28.4k (x1.07)
Multithread
N5095
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
20.23k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
20.83k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
9.49k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
4.04k (x1.49)
TOTAL
93.26k
54.6k (x0.59)
Performance/W
N5095
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
578 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
595 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
115 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
1560 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
3300 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
2960 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1205 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
8607 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4