| | | | | | |

Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.

Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
706e5
Core
Jasper Lake
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
142.69k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
7.07k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
10.55k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
5.27k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
5.66k (x2.4)
TOTAL
26.6k
28.56k (x1.07)

Multithread

N5095

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
25.28k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
37.48k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
17.77k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
6.92k (x2.55)
TOTAL
93.26k
87.45k (x0.94)

Performance/W
N5095
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
5830 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5095
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4