| | | | | | |

Celeron N5095 vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.

Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
806ec
Core
Jasper Lake
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
106.58k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
14.3k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
20.09k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
5.23k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
4.24k (x1.8)
TOTAL
26.6k
43.87k (x1.65)

Multithread

N5095

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
25.51k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
41.33k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
10.81k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
3.21k (x1.18)
TOTAL
93.26k
80.85k (x0.87)

Performance/W
N5095
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
1700 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
2755 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
5390 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5095
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
4901 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
10699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4