Celeron N5095 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
810f10
Core
Jasper Lake
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
71.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
11.67k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
14.02k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
4.53k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
2.93k (x1.24)
TOTAL
26.6k
33.14k (x1.25)
Multithread
N5095
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
20.49k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
31.32k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
9.99k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
3.03k (x1.11)
TOTAL
93.26k
64.82k (x0.7)
Performance/W
N5095
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
4322 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4