Celeron N5095 vs A6 9210
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 3.7 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 3.7 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
670f00
Core
Jasper Lake
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2021
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
4.87k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
10.38k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
2.59k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
2.38k (x1.01)
TOTAL
26.6k
20.22k (x0.76)
Multithread
N5095
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
7.41k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
11.87k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
3.35k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.6k (x0.96)
TOTAL
93.26k
25.23k (x0.27)
Performance/W
N5095
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4