Celeron N4120 vs Xeon E3-1225
Description
The N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the E3-1225 gets 69 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1225 is 1.5 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the E3-1225 gets 69 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1225 is 1.5 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
206a7
Core
Gemini Lake
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
April 2011
Mean monothread perf.
18.9k points
23.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.17k points
68.97k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
5.94k
9.65k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
7.51k
7.76k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
3.95k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
2.57k (x0.96)
TOTAL
18.9k
23.94k (x1.27)
Multithread
N4120
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
30.52k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.77k
24.1k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.71k
12.01k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.67k
2.34k (x0.64)
TOTAL
46.17k
68.97k (x1.49)
Performance/W
N4120
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
2503 points/W
321 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3294 points/W
254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/W
126 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
7694 points/W
726 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4120
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
2286 points/GHz
2839 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/GHz
2283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1069 points/GHz
1162 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1029 points/GHz
757 points/GHz
TOTAL
7271 points/GHz
7041 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4