Celeron N4120 vs Core i5-450M
Description
The N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-450M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the i5-450M gets 29.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-450M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the i5-450M gets 29.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-450M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
20655
Core
Gemini Lake
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
June 2010
Mean monothread perf.
18.9k points
12.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.17k points
29.1k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.94k
5.4k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
7.51k
3.7k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
2.06k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
1.77k (x0.66)
TOTAL
18.9k
12.93k (x0.68)
Multithread
N4120
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
11.83k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
19.77k
9.39k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.71k
5.31k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.67k
2.58k (x0.7)
TOTAL
46.17k
29.1k (x0.63)
Performance/W
N4120
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
2503 points/W
338 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3294 points/W
268 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/W
152 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
7694 points/W
831 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4120
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
2286 points/GHz
2024 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1069 points/GHz
772 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1029 points/GHz
665 points/GHz
TOTAL
7271 points/GHz
4850 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4