| | | | | | |

Celeron N4120 vs Core i3-3110M


Description
The N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.

Summarizing, the N4120 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a8
306a9
Core
Gemini Lake
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
18.9k points
17.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.17k points
33.81k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.94k
6.66k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
7.51k
6.88k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
2.68k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
2.6k (x0.97)
TOTAL
18.9k
18.83k (x1)

Multithread

N4120

i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
16.56k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.77k
11.7k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.71k
7.28k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.67k
2.25k (x0.61)
TOTAL
46.17k
37.78k (x0.82)

Performance/W
N4120
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
2503 points/W
473 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3294 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
7694 points/W
1080 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4120
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
2286 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/GHz
2868 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1069 points/GHz
1118 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1029 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
7271 points/GHz
7847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4