Celeron N4120 vs J4105
Description
Both models N4120 and J4105 are based on Goldmont Plus architecture.
Goldmont Plus is a low power architecture intended for Atom, Celeron y Pentium Silver SoCs. It uses the 14nm process and come with the Gen9 Intel’s iGPU.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.3 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Goldmont Plus is a low power architecture intended for Atom, Celeron y Pentium Silver SoCs. It uses the 14nm process and come with the Gen9 Intel’s iGPU.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.3 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
706a1
Core
Gemini Lake
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
18.9k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.17k points
61.49k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
5.94k
4.9k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
7.51k
7.26k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
2.75k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
3.32k (x1.24)
TOTAL
18.9k
18.22k (x0.96)
Multithread
N4120
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
18.84k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
19.77k
27.45k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.71k
10.35k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.67k
4.85k (x1.32)
TOTAL
46.17k
61.49k (x1.33)
Performance/W
N4120
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2503 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3294 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
7694 points/W
6149 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4120
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2286 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1069 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1029 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
7271 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4