Celeron N4100 vs Xeon X3430
Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.4 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.4 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
106e5
Core
Gemini Lake
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2017
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
55.66k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
6.41k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
4.27k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
2.38k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
2.67k (x0.95)
TOTAL
17.21k
15.74k (x0.91)
Multithread
N4100
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
25.19k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
16.76k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
9.33k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
4.37k (x1.31)
TOTAL
40.57k
55.66k (x1.37)
Performance/W
N4100
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
586 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4100
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4