| | | | | | |

Celeron N4100 vs Xeon W3550


Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the W3550 is based on .

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W3550 is 1.8 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
106a5
Core
Gemini Lake
Bloomfield
Architecture
Goldmont Plus
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
6 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2017
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
73.21k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
8.34k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
5.56k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
3.26k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
3.08k (x1.1)
TOTAL
17.21k
20.24k (x1.18)

Multithread

N4100

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
32.5k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
21.59k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
12.85k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
6.27k (x1.88)
TOTAL
40.57k
73.21k (x1.8)

Performance/W
N4100
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
250 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
563 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4100
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
2502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
6073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4