Celeron N4100 vs Xeon W3530
Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 1.8 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 1.8 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
106a5
Core
Gemini Lake
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
6 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2017
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
7.51k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
4.93k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
3.02k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
2.74k (x0.97)
TOTAL
17.21k
18.2k (x1.06)
Multithread
N4100
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
31.33k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
23.11k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
15.78k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
2.55k (x0.77)
TOTAL
40.57k
72.77k (x1.79)
Performance/W
N4100
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4100
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4