Celeron N4100 vs Xeon E5506
Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
106a5
Core
Gemini Lake
Gainestown
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
90.45k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
4.48k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
2.99k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
1.81k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
0.69k (x0.25)
TOTAL
17.21k
9.97k (x0.58)
Multithread
N4100
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
41k (x3.27)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
28.17k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
17.4k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
3.88k (x1.17)
TOTAL
40.57k
90.45k (x2.23)
Performance/W
N4100
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
1131 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4100
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4